Monday, July 23, 2018
Thursday, July 19, 2018
Wednesday, July 18, 2018
Tuesday, July 17, 2018
Some semantic analysis needed here: Katherine Hayhoe-Climate Scientist
https://climatecrocks.com/2017/12/06/no-chemtrails-are-not-a-thing-dr-katharine-hayhoe/
IS it just my imagination or does Katherine Hayhoe resemble Flo the spokeswoman for Progressive Insurance? See: https://www.clevescene.com/scene-and-heard/archives/2014/11/10/watch-progressives-100th-ad-with-flo
A little critical thinking may be needed to interpret this cozy, happy benign video presentation. Though it sounds more like kindergarten than science, nonetheless Ms. Katherine is a sweet person I am sure, however naive in her view of climate management. Moreover there are several giveaways which underline the masterfully sophistic rhetorical tricks and flourishes which shield the lie.
In fact these climate scientists such as David Keith all present their case in the same manner---I attended a climate science event at Penn State's State Theatre---it was highly choreographed---an example of rigorously multi-tiered propaganda seen in the former Soviet Union and in the Vatican. AT any rate, each of these chemtrail debunking videos begins with an outright denial of a government program to harm US citizenry with this secret chemtrail program. Indeed, I can agree with this assertion, but it is a forked conclusion---Katherine Hayhoe has not denied that there is and will be a global spraying program, using 'contrails'. Now think! The chemtrails that she denies are presented as a future good idea---risky but prudently necessary. This is David Keith's presentation style to the tee.
A contrail that sprays chemicals is a form of SRM (solar radiation management)---this she admits and indeed it is, she also admits that it is a specific addition of varying chemical dusts (to mimic the atmosphere of a volcano (Sulfuric Acid) to airplane contrails---and this is a prudent form of geoengineering. She fails to mention that these are indeed by definition identical to the program of chemtrails which she denies saying that it is not a thing.
So, here you have two trivial 'truths': a) chemtrails is not a thing-which is granted easily---no, it is a program that manages the solar radiation through strategic aerosol spraying in ordinary jet contrails. and b)there is no grand spraying project to harm human life. Both of these statements are trivially true. The second moreover would require that a full-scale study were executed to test the safeness or validity of this said approach to managing the climate via spraying. In other words in Ms. Hathoe's view or in Professor Keith's view their intention is good. They have already accepted the unwarranted conclusion that global warming imposes an unprecedented threat to all life systems on earth and that therefore a Mephistophelean compromise may be necessary in the form of spraying engineering (chemtrails- though they refuse the word 'chemtrail'---I might remind them that a rose by any other name is still a rose. OK don't call it chemtrails---call it a type of SRM, call it Strategic Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SSAI) call is SNAFU for all I care.
Katherine Hayhoe's naivete is that she makes the same presentation I have analyzed and interpreted here, and yet she fails to see that my critical thinking blows her presentation out of the water. How does a nice, intelligent, woman who purports to be a christian, come to present such sophistic rhetoric in defense of what she admits is coming? Does her view of being a follower of Christ entail the serious interpretation of end times signs?
There is another interpretation: the diabolic works in precisely this manner---there is one charismatic presenter (such as D. Keith) who may be under his own, or under someone yet more dominant spiritually. It is as if he is hypnotized, just as Katherine here.
IS it just my imagination or does Katherine Hayhoe resemble Flo the spokeswoman for Progressive Insurance? See: https://www.clevescene.com/scene-and-heard/archives/2014/11/10/watch-progressives-100th-ad-with-flo
A little critical thinking may be needed to interpret this cozy, happy benign video presentation. Though it sounds more like kindergarten than science, nonetheless Ms. Katherine is a sweet person I am sure, however naive in her view of climate management. Moreover there are several giveaways which underline the masterfully sophistic rhetorical tricks and flourishes which shield the lie.
In fact these climate scientists such as David Keith all present their case in the same manner---I attended a climate science event at Penn State's State Theatre---it was highly choreographed---an example of rigorously multi-tiered propaganda seen in the former Soviet Union and in the Vatican. AT any rate, each of these chemtrail debunking videos begins with an outright denial of a government program to harm US citizenry with this secret chemtrail program. Indeed, I can agree with this assertion, but it is a forked conclusion---Katherine Hayhoe has not denied that there is and will be a global spraying program, using 'contrails'. Now think! The chemtrails that she denies are presented as a future good idea---risky but prudently necessary. This is David Keith's presentation style to the tee.
A contrail that sprays chemicals is a form of SRM (solar radiation management)---this she admits and indeed it is, she also admits that it is a specific addition of varying chemical dusts (to mimic the atmosphere of a volcano (Sulfuric Acid) to airplane contrails---and this is a prudent form of geoengineering. She fails to mention that these are indeed by definition identical to the program of chemtrails which she denies saying that it is not a thing.
So, here you have two trivial 'truths': a) chemtrails is not a thing-which is granted easily---no, it is a program that manages the solar radiation through strategic aerosol spraying in ordinary jet contrails. and b)there is no grand spraying project to harm human life. Both of these statements are trivially true. The second moreover would require that a full-scale study were executed to test the safeness or validity of this said approach to managing the climate via spraying. In other words in Ms. Hathoe's view or in Professor Keith's view their intention is good. They have already accepted the unwarranted conclusion that global warming imposes an unprecedented threat to all life systems on earth and that therefore a Mephistophelean compromise may be necessary in the form of spraying engineering (chemtrails- though they refuse the word 'chemtrail'---I might remind them that a rose by any other name is still a rose. OK don't call it chemtrails---call it a type of SRM, call it Strategic Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SSAI) call is SNAFU for all I care.
Katherine Hayhoe's naivete is that she makes the same presentation I have analyzed and interpreted here, and yet she fails to see that my critical thinking blows her presentation out of the water. How does a nice, intelligent, woman who purports to be a christian, come to present such sophistic rhetoric in defense of what she admits is coming? Does her view of being a follower of Christ entail the serious interpretation of end times signs?
There is another interpretation: the diabolic works in precisely this manner---there is one charismatic presenter (such as D. Keith) who may be under his own, or under someone yet more dominant spiritually. It is as if he is hypnotized, just as Katherine here.
Eschatology and Apocalyptic Vision
My friends and I were breaking bread on friday evening and discussing history---Becker's book on the 18th century philosophers' heavenly city----Dante and Carlito were locked into another semantic debate possessed by the quest for clearcut definition. Carlito had a habit of blurting out whole buckets of ideas kind of like taking wet paint and slapping it onto the wall and floor---and as is wont with such passionate speakers he often overstepped the point under discussion---On the other hand, in Dante one discovers a true hairsplitting inquisitor---my role is to translate the one to the other (on good occasions), or to stand clear when they locked in mortal etymological battle---
Amongst glasses of lambrusco and fine food discussions concerning the psychology of Wm. James, the archetypal psychology of Carl Jung, the Bible, or Dostoevsky proceed into labyrinthine debates concerning time and space, the problem of evil, the origin of personhood, etc. proliferate ad infinitum! But each one is staking their own angle or perspective into account---and amongst this amicable colloquy consensus or agreement is often reached. But what of those who do not practice philosophical dialogue at all? Surely to the layman, or average Joe we must seem somewhat odd if not mad in fact.
It then dawned upon me then that I must be looking at things from another angle---- a completely different angle! For me, the prophetic works of the Bible and other prophecies are to be taken as "required reading"---the basis of where my perspective begins. Notice how strange the views of such an eschatological thinker must seem to someone who does not consider world events, and news in this interpretive heuristic.
I started up Apocalypse Illustrated some years ago in order to express my eschatological vision, that is, my perspective of world events as the unfolding of prophetic revelation. Here in Apocalypse Illustrated you may find many links chronologically laid out of events that in my mind at least seem to evidence (in some cases beyond the shadow of a doubt, in others not) the unveiling at the end of the age (to aschaton).
For example: If we take the historic (what the &^* does 'historical' mean anymore?) at any rate if we take the meeting between President Donald J. Trump and President Vladimir Putin as an example---the mainstream news media accounts (Foxnews, NPR, CNN, etc...) do not discuss the prophetic significance of these historic events, they proceed from a thoroughly 'secularized' point of view, one that does not see the Hand of God at work in human affairs on a day to day basis. The eschatological point of view which is evidenced in this blog suggests that there is a hidden game being played and that it is visible as a 'sign' to whom it is given to understand while to others this seems like nonsense, perhaps even dangerous nonsense!
Please enjoy your visits to Apocalypse Illustrated! We most certainly are blessed to live in these times wherein the evil empire may finally be ostensibly overthrown by the True King who conquered Satan and death shedding his blood on the cross for the sake of redemption and salvation of every soul that came into the world.
Amongst glasses of lambrusco and fine food discussions concerning the psychology of Wm. James, the archetypal psychology of Carl Jung, the Bible, or Dostoevsky proceed into labyrinthine debates concerning time and space, the problem of evil, the origin of personhood, etc. proliferate ad infinitum! But each one is staking their own angle or perspective into account---and amongst this amicable colloquy consensus or agreement is often reached. But what of those who do not practice philosophical dialogue at all? Surely to the layman, or average Joe we must seem somewhat odd if not mad in fact.
It then dawned upon me then that I must be looking at things from another angle---- a completely different angle! For me, the prophetic works of the Bible and other prophecies are to be taken as "required reading"---the basis of where my perspective begins. Notice how strange the views of such an eschatological thinker must seem to someone who does not consider world events, and news in this interpretive heuristic.
I started up Apocalypse Illustrated some years ago in order to express my eschatological vision, that is, my perspective of world events as the unfolding of prophetic revelation. Here in Apocalypse Illustrated you may find many links chronologically laid out of events that in my mind at least seem to evidence (in some cases beyond the shadow of a doubt, in others not) the unveiling at the end of the age (to aschaton).
For example: If we take the historic (what the &^* does 'historical' mean anymore?) at any rate if we take the meeting between President Donald J. Trump and President Vladimir Putin as an example---the mainstream news media accounts (Foxnews, NPR, CNN, etc...) do not discuss the prophetic significance of these historic events, they proceed from a thoroughly 'secularized' point of view, one that does not see the Hand of God at work in human affairs on a day to day basis. The eschatological point of view which is evidenced in this blog suggests that there is a hidden game being played and that it is visible as a 'sign' to whom it is given to understand while to others this seems like nonsense, perhaps even dangerous nonsense!
Please enjoy your visits to Apocalypse Illustrated! We most certainly are blessed to live in these times wherein the evil empire may finally be ostensibly overthrown by the True King who conquered Satan and death shedding his blood on the cross for the sake of redemption and salvation of every soul that came into the world.
Monday, July 16, 2018
Pastor JD Farag: Prophetic Lesson Concerning Ezekiel 38
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE8wEsEiwVwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE8wEsEiwVw
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
